People ex rel. New York Central v. Woodbury

167 A.D. 535, 153 N.Y.S. 541, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8289
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 5, 1915·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Kellogg, J.:

The question presented is whether the appellant’s railroad-crossing of canal lands is a special franchise. In other .words, whether canal lands are to be deemed public places ” within the fair meaning of subdivision 3 of section 2 of the Tax Law.

The question was considered in People ex rel. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. v. Woodbury (140 App. Div. 850; 208 N. Y. 421) and People ex rel. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. v. Wood-bury (140 App. Div. 945; 208 N. Y. 425). In those cases it was considered that the crossing of relator’s railroad over such lands was a special franchise.

The order is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. New York Central v. Woodbury, 167 A.D. 535, 153 N.Y.S. 541, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8289 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

167 A.D. 535 (People ex rel. New York Central v. Woodbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. State Tax Commission
205 A.D. 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)
People Ex Rel. R., S. E.R.R. Co. v. . Moroney
120 N.E. 149 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
People ex rel. Rochester, Syracuse & Eastern Railroad v. Moroney
224 N.Y. 114 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)