People ex rel. New York Central Railroad v. Graves

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. New York Central Railroad v. Graves

260 A.D. 227, 21 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4566

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 A.D. 227 (People ex rel. New York Central Railroad v. Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. New York Central Railroad v. Graves, 260 A.D. 227, 21 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4566 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the Albany county clerk’s office on January 5, 1940, finally confirming special franchise assessments for the year 1936 for several occupations in streets in the city of Syracuse.

These special franchise assessments arise out of grade crossing eliminations .in the city of Syracuse by which the tracks of the main line of the New York Central Eailroad Company were removed from Washington street and relocated on the right-of-way of its lessor, the West Shore Eailroad Company. The West Shore tracks were elevated above the former grade by construction of a solid embankment between streets to be crossed and the steel and concrete bridges over the streets.

The appellant urges that the structures within the streets are not tangible property of appellant within the meaning of sub[228]*228division 6 of section 2 of the Tax Law and that these structures do not occupy a public place under grant from the State.

It is claimed that the inclusion of the value of the tangible property in the grade elimination structures as a part of the special franchises constitutes a denial of due process and equal protection. Such inclusion is in accordance with section 2 of the Tax Law. It is also claimed that the railroad may not be legally assessed for these elevated structures where it previously had ample facilities for the operation of its line of railroad and was compelled to make the present changes by order of a State agency solely for public benefit. This same contention was denied as to the portions of the project between the streets in Matter of New York Central R. R. Co. v. Ferris (255 App. Div. 112; affd., 280 N. Y. 658). Appellants also urge that because the bridge structures are not less than fourteen feet above the streets, they do not occupy a zone of highway user and consequently are not assessable as portions of the special franchise.

The order should be confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements.

Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur.

Order confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the Albany county clerk’s office on January 5, 1940, finally confirming special franchise assessments for the year 1936 for several occupations in streets in the city of Syracuse.

These special franchise assessments arise out of grade crossing eliminations .in the city of Syracuse by which the tracks of the main line of the New York Central Eailroad Company were removed from Washington street and relocated on the right-of-way of its lessor, the West Shore Eailroad Company. The West Shore tracks were elevated above the former grade by construction of a solid embankment between streets to be crossed and the steel and concrete bridges over the streets.

The appellant urges that the structures within the streets are not tangible property of appellant within the meaning of sub[228]*228division 6 of section 2 of the Tax Law and that these structures do not occupy a public place under grant from the State.

It is claimed that the inclusion of the value of the tangible property in the grade elimination structures as a part of the special franchises constitutes a denial of due process and equal protection. Such inclusion is in accordance with section 2 of the Tax Law. It is also claimed that the railroad may not be legally assessed for these elevated structures where it previously had ample facilities for the operation of its line of railroad and was compelled to make the present changes by order of a State agency solely for public benefit. This same contention was denied as to the portions of the project between the streets in Matter of New York Central R. R. Co. v. Ferris (255 App. Div. 112; affd., 280 N. Y. 658). Appellants also urge that because the bridge structures are not less than fourteen feet above the streets, they do not occupy a zone of highway user and consequently are not assessable as portions of the special franchise.

The order should be confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements.

Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur.

Order confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 227, 21 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-new-york-central-railroad-v-graves-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack