People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Woodbury

145 A.D. 900
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Woodbury. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 A.D. 848

Opinion

Order affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements.

All concurred, except Kellogg and Sewell, JJ., dissenting in part, being of the opinion that the relator is not assessable for street occupation where the street was opened and extended across the right of way the fee of which had been purchased by and conveyed to the relator before the street was opened.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Woodbury, 145 A.D. 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

145 A.D. 900 (People ex rel. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Woodbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.