People ex rel. Negron v. Herold

33 A.D.2d 1076, 307 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5464
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 20, 1970
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 33 A.D.2d 1076 (People ex rel. Negron v. Herold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Negron v. Herold, 33 A.D.2d 1076, 307 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Clinton County, denying an application for a writ of habeas corpus without a hearing. Special Term erred in denying the application for the writ on the basis of a pending action in federal court. Such action was clearly not similar to the one brought before the trial court. Appellant alleges that he was transferred to Dannemora without a hearing despite a demand therefore made by his family pursuant to section 383 of the Correction Law. If appellant’s allegations are presumed correct his transfer would be improper and the writ should thus have been issued (see People ex rel. Brown v. Johnston, 9 N Y 2d 482). However, the State alleges that appellant was sent to Dannemora pursuant to subdivision 7 of section 383 which provides for a temporary transfer without a hearing pending judicial proceedings upon the affidavit of two • examining physicians that the Warden is unable to properly care for the prisoner at the prison and that the prisoner is in need of immediate treatment. This is arguably possible on the facts available, but the instant record is so devoid of any proof as to the actual basis of the transfer and facts surrounding it that a decision is not possible at this posture. The reason for this is that appellant’s petition does not comply with CPLR 7002 (subd. [c], par. 1) in that the mandate under which he is confined is not annexed. Accordingly, the petition was properly denied (People ex rel. Gante v. Herold, 24 A D 2d 776, mot. for lv. to app. den. 17 N Y 2d 420). We pass on no further issues raised by appellant at this time. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Neal v. State
290 Neb. 943 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2015)
People ex rel. Ayers v. Lombard
87 Misc. 2d 355 (New York County Courts, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 A.D.2d 1076, 307 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-negron-v-herold-nyappdiv-1970.