People ex rel. Muscatello v. Schriro

111 A.D.3d 860, 975 N.Y.S.2d 356

This text of 111 A.D.3d 860 (People ex rel. Muscatello v. Schriro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Muscatello v. Schriro, 111 A.D.3d 860, 975 N.Y.S.2d 356 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

— Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for the release of Kareem Davis pursuant to CPL 30.30 (2) (a) upon Queens County indictment No. 2049/12.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The People are chargeable with less than 90 days of delay in bringing Kareem Davis to trial on Queens County indictment No. 2049/12 (see CPL 30.30 [2] [a]; People v Robinson, 47 AD3d 847 [2008]; cf. People v Wearen, 98 AD3d 535 [2012]; People v Rahim, 91 AD3d 970 [2012]). Accordingly, Kareem Davis is not entitled to release pursuant to CPL 30.30 (2) (a), and the writ of habeas corpus must be dismissed. Balkin, J.E, Lott, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Robinson
47 A.D.3d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Rahim
91 A.D.3d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Wearen
98 A.D.3d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 A.D.3d 860, 975 N.Y.S.2d 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-muscatello-v-schriro-nyappdiv-2013.