People ex rel. Moore v. Bednosky

198 A.D.2d 251, 604 N.Y.S.2d 807
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 1, 1993·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), dated July 28, 1993, which, after a hearing, sustained the writ to the extent of reducing bail from $2,500,000, with a cash bail alternative of $250,000, to $100,000 bond with a cash bail alternative of $50,000.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the proceeding is dismissed.

[252] The County Court’s bail determination, based upon the factors outlined in CPL 510.20 (2), is supported by the record. Thus, it constituted an exercise of discretion with a rational basis which should not have been disturbed (see, People ex rel. Parker v Hasenauer, 62 NY2d 777; People ex rel. Gamble v Romano, 172 AD2d 575). Lawrence, J. P., Eiber, O’Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Moore v. Bednosky, 198 A.D.2d 251, 604 N.Y.S.2d 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

198 A.D.2d 251 (People ex rel. Moore v. Bednosky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Schreiber v. Warden of Queens House of Detention for Men
282 A.D.2d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People ex rel. Cassar v. Bednowsky
231 A.D.2d 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People ex rel. Geitschier v. Bednowsky
227 A.D.2d 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)