People ex rel. Mooney v. Sheriff of New York County

245 A.D. 97, 280 N.Y.S. 904, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10235

This text of 245 A.D. 97 (People ex rel. Mooney v. Sheriff of New York County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Mooney v. Sheriff of New York County, 245 A.D. 97, 280 N.Y.S. 904, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The privilege extended to witnesses to refuse to respond to inquiries in actions or proceedings in the courts of New York is confined by statute to communications between physician and patient, nurse and patient, attorney and his employees and client, clergyman and penitent and in some instances husband and wife. There is no other privilege extended by statute. Com[98]*98munications made to persons engaged in the occupation of reporter of a newspaper are not included in any statutory privilege. The court may not prescribe such privilege in behalf of a particular class. The Legislature alone may do so.

The order should be affirmed.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D. 97, 280 N.Y.S. 904, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-mooney-v-sheriff-of-new-york-county-nyappdiv-1935.