People ex rel. Montgomery v. Artus
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell P Buscaglia, A.J.), entered November 29, 2011 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that he was improperly sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender on his 1998 conviction of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [1172] [2]). We conclude that Supreme Court properly denied the petition. “Habeas corpus relief is unavailable because petitioner’s contention[s] in support of the petition ‘could have been . . . raised on direct appeal or by a motion pursuant to CPL article 440’ ” (People ex rel. Lewis v Graham, 96 AD3d 1423, 1423 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 813 [2012]; see People ex rel. Martinez v Graham, 98 AD3d 1312, 1312 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 853 [2012]; People ex rel. Lanfair v Corcoran, 60 AD3d 1351, 1351 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 714 [2009]). Present — Scudder, PJ., Fahey, Peradotto, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
114 A.D.3d 1171 (People ex rel. Montgomery v. Artus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.