People ex rel. Messick v. Sorensen
32 A.D.2d 873, 301 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3675
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to the statement of Special Term, we find that the Clinton County Judge did make a reviewable record. A question of fact was presented as to whether or not defendant was armed at the time of the commission of the crime. We find that habeas corpus was a proper remedy. (People ex rel. Romano v. Brophy, 280 N. Y. 181 and 707.) (Appeal from judgment of Erie Special Term dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present—-Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Messick v. Sorensen, 32 A.D.2d 873, 301 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).
32 A.D.2d 873 (People ex rel. Messick v. Sorensen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People Ex Rel. Romano v. Brophy
20 N.E.2d 385 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)