People ex rel. Messick v. Sorensen

32 A.D.2d 873, 301 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3675

This text of 32 A.D.2d 873 (People ex rel. Messick v. Sorensen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Messick v. Sorensen, 32 A.D.2d 873, 301 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to the statement of Special Term, we find that the Clinton County Judge did make a reviewable record. A question of fact was presented as to whether or not defendant was armed at the time of the commission of the crime. We find that habeas corpus was a proper remedy. (People ex rel. Romano v. Brophy, 280 N. Y. 181 and 707.) (Appeal from judgment of Erie Special Term dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present—-Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People Ex Rel. Romano v. Brophy
20 N.E.2d 385 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 A.D.2d 873, 301 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-messick-v-sorensen-nyappdiv-1969.