People ex rel. Melvin v. Warden Orange County Jail
This text of 94 A.D.2d 808 (People ex rel. Melvin v. Warden Orange County Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Buell, J.), dated September 27, 1982, which dismissed the writ. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. It is well settled that habeas corpus is not to serve as a substitute for an appeal (see, e.g., People ex rel. Frazier v Coombe, 87 AD2d 904). The issues raised by petitioner in his application for habeas corpus relief can be developed in his appeal from the judgment of conviction. Accordingly, we hold that it was not improper for the Supreme Court, Orange County, to dismiss the writ without a hearing. Damiani, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 A.D.2d 808, 462 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-melvin-v-warden-orange-county-jail-nyappdiv-1983.