People ex rel. Mead v. Highway Commissioners

16 Mich. 63, 1867 Mich. LEXIS 65
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 9, 1867·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Ouriam.

Where a highway is discontinued, the record of the proceedings filed with the town clerk must show everything necessary to make the proceedings valid. In this case it is admitted the record is defective, in not showing notice to the parties interested, and it is proposed to supply the omission by having affidavits filed with the town clerk to show that proper notice was given. It is not denied that the proceedings on file in that office must in some way show this. Whether the commissioners who made the return to the clerk could make any subsequent addition or amendments to it under any circumstances, may be questionable. But they cannot at any rate do this after they go out of office. And the law has piade no provision for any such action.

As no return which can be made will rectify this defect, there would be no propriety in remanding the papers. The motion must be denied.

The respondents having no further ground of defense, the proceedings were quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Mead v. Highway Commissioners, 16 Mich. 63, 1867 Mich. LEXIS 65 (Mich. 1867).

16 Mich. 63 (People ex rel. Mead v. Highway Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brophy v. Schindler
85 N.W. 1114 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)
Van Auken v. Highway Commissioners
27 Mich. 414 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1873)
Farrer v. Highway Commissioners
2 Mich. N.P. 106 (Circuit Court of the 43rd Circuit of Michigan, 1871)