People ex rel. McTigue v. Manning

16 N.Y.S. 604, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2129
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 8, 1891·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Learned, P. J.

Although the case of People v. French, 102 N. Y. 583, 7 N. E. Rep. 913, is not exactly similar to this, yet the principle there decided applies here. There was really no trial of any fact before the board. The board did not convict the relator of any breach of duty. It only acted upon the fact of his conviction of a crime. This fact, by the charter,1 prevented him from being, after his conviction, a member of the police force. It was only for the board to take notice of such conviction, and to treat him thereafter as not a member of such force. If the relator is injured,—that is, if he was not convicted of a crime,—then it seems plain that he might have a mandamus to compel the board to recognize him as still one of the police force. The proceedings should be confirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. McTigue v. Manning, 16 N.Y.S. 604, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2129 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

16 N.Y.S. 604 (People ex rel. McTigue v. Manning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Dunn v. Ham
32 Misc. 517 (New York Supreme Court, 1900)