People ex rel. McGowan v. MacLean

New York Supreme Court

People ex rel. McGowan v. MacLean

13 N.Y.S. 685, 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 539, 59 Hun 625, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1637

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 13, 1891

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 N.Y.S. 685 (People ex rel. McGowan v. MacLean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. McGowan v. MacLean, 13 N.Y.S. 685, 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 539, 59 Hun 625, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1637 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.

There is no question but that the proofs establish the fact that the relator was guilty of insubordination and conduct unbecoming an officer, and the only question presented upon this certiorari is the claim made on behalf of the relator that he was insane at the time of doing the acts. ” We have examined the record, and we find nothing in the evidence to justify such a conclusion, except so far as every man may be insane who loses his temper or does a silly act which results in his injury. There is nothing in the evidence which justifies the conclusion that the condition of this man’s mind was such as to make him irresponsible for his acts. If, instead of abusing his superior officer, he had assaulted him, and a criminal prosecution had resulted, there is nothing in this evidence which would have justified a jury in finding that he was not responsible for his crime. His nerves may have been unstrung, and he may have been rendered suspicious and petulant because of some supposed conpiracy against him; but these facts did not render him irresponsible for his acts, and unless such a condition of mind is shown, and, upon a proceeding such as this, so conclusively shown that the court would reverse the verdict of a jury, this court cannot interfere. The evidence utterly fails to establish any such condition of mind. In fact no justification whatever was offered for the conduct of the relator. The writ should be dismissed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Brunt, P. J.

There is no question but that the proofs establish the fact that the relator was guilty of insubordination and conduct unbecoming an officer, and the only question presented upon this certiorari is the claim made on behalf of the relator that he was insane at the time of doing the acts. ” We have examined the record, and we find nothing in the evidence to justify such a conclusion, except so far as every man may be insane who loses his temper or does a silly act which results in his injury. There is nothing in the evidence which justifies the conclusion that the condition of this man’s mind was such as to make him irresponsible for his acts. If, instead of abusing his superior officer, he had assaulted him, and a criminal prosecution had resulted, there is nothing in this evidence which would have justified a jury in finding that he was not responsible for his crime. His nerves may have been unstrung, and he may have been rendered suspicious and petulant because of some supposed conpiracy against him; but these facts did not render him irresponsible for his acts, and unless such a condition of mind is shown, and, upon a proceeding such as this, so conclusively shown that the court would reverse the verdict of a jury, this court cannot interfere. The evidence utterly fails to establish any such condition of mind. In fact no justification whatever was offered for the conduct of the relator. The writ should be dismissed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 N.Y.S. 685, 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 539, 59 Hun 625, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-mcgowan-v-maclean-nysupct-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack