People ex rel. McGoldrick v. Douglas
This text of 286 A.D. 807 (People ex rel. McGoldrick v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is apparent that the defendants exercised no diligence and made no earnest effort to comply with the order of the court and carry out its mandate. While defendants obtained certificates of eviction, they did not take due action thereafter to effect the evictions. They show nothing more in defense than their disposition of the property and disabling of themselves to take the required action. Without any further showing of effort to comply with the order of the court or showing of the circumstances of their disposition of the property, other than the cavalier conclusion that it was done to avert economic catastrophe, there was no defense to the application to punish for contempt. , Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, the motion granted and the matter remitted to Special Term for the determination of punishment by fine. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 A.D. 807, 141 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-mcgoldrick-v-douglas-nyappdiv-1955.