People ex rel. McDougal v. Johnston

6 Cal. 673
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1856·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.

Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.

The Act of April 19, 1856, to repeal the several charters of the city of San Francisco,” etc., did not go into effect until the first day of July 1856.

Section four of the schedule of that Act, which provides for an election in the county of San Mateo, to take place on the second Monday in May, 1856, was not law until the succeeding July, and therefore was no warrant for holding the election which took place, and the election consequently conferred no rights.

The judgment is reversed, and the District Court is directed to enter judgment for the plaintiff, ousting the defendant of his office.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. McDougal v. Johnston, 6 Cal. 673 (Cal. 1856).

6 Cal. 673 (People ex rel. McDougal v. Johnston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kennelly v. Lowery
149 P.2d 476 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)
State Ex Rel. Swan v. Kozer
239 P. 805 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1925)
State ex rel. Larger v. Scow
164 N.W. 939 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1917)
State ex rel. Langer v. Crawford
162 N.W. 710 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1917)
State ex rel. Dreibelbiss v. Berghoff
63 N.E. 717 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1902)
Henderson v. State ex rel. Stout
36 N.E. 257 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
State ex rel. Everding v. Simon
26 P. 170 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1891)
Miller v. Kister
8 P. 813 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Keane v. Cushing
15 Mo. App. 96 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1884)