People ex rel. McDonald v. Carter

186 A.D. 905, 172 N.Y.S. 913
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1918·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The relator appeals from so much of the order of the Special Term as denied his prayer that it be determined that the provisions of chapter 358 of the Laws of 1916 are retroactive, so that the compensation to which he is entitled may be calculated from the date of his arrival at the State prison in 1914. This is the only question before the court on this appeal, the defendants having in open court withdrawn their appeal from the remaining provisions of the order. Without passing upon the objection that the question raised is not properly involved in this mandamus proceeding against the individual defendants, we think the learned judge at Special Term was right in his decision [See 103 Mise. Rep. 596] that the act (Laws of 1916, chap. 358) was not retroactive, and that by its express provisions (§ 230, subd. 3)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. McDonald v. Carter, 186 A.D. 905, 172 N.Y.S. 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).

186 A.D. 905 (People ex rel. McDonald v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Gabriel v. Warden
109 Misc. 248 (New York Supreme Court, 1919)