People ex rel. McDaniel v. Herbert

225 A.D.2d 1095, 639 N.Y.2d 239, 639 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3003
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 8, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 1095 (People ex rel. McDaniel v. Herbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. McDaniel v. Herbert, 225 A.D.2d 1095, 639 N.Y.2d 239, 639 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3003 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Memorandum: Relator challenges the computation by the Board of Parole of delinquent time owed in its final declaration of delinquency. Because that issue could have been raised in an administrative appeal (see, 9 NYCRR 8006.3) and relator has not demonstrated that he has exhausted his administrative remedies with respect to it, habeas corpus relief is not available (see, 9 NYCRR part 8006; People ex rel. Woods v McGreevy, 191 AD2d 938, 940). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Childs v. Bennett
231 A.D.2d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 1095, 639 N.Y.2d 239, 639 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-mcdaniel-v-herbert-nyappdiv-1996.