People ex rel. Maxwell v. Maxwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Maxwell v. Maxwell

254 A.D. 863, 6 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8070

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 863 (People ex rel. Maxwell v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Maxwell v. Maxwell, 254 A.D. 863, 6 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8070 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan and Cohn, JJ., dissent and vote to modify the order dated July 31, 1936, and entered August 4, 1936, by striking out the provision for the bond, on the ground that the provision in the order requiring a bond of $50,000 to be given by the mother to insure her keeping the child in this jurisdiction is too harsh; she is unable to furnish such a bond, and her inability to furnish it has resulted in depriving her of the partial custody of the child.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan and Cohn, JJ., dissent and vote to modify the order dated July 31, 1936, and entered August 4, 1936, by striking out the provision for the bond, on the ground that the provision in the order requiring a bond of $50,000 to be given by the mother to insure her keeping the child in this jurisdiction is too harsh; she is unable to furnish such a bond, and her inability to furnish it has resulted in depriving her of the partial custody of the child.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 863, 6 N.Y.S.2d 374, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-maxwell-v-maxwell-nyappdiv-1938.