People ex rel. Matheny v. Scully

127 A.D.2d 719, 511 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43209

This text of 127 A.D.2d 719 (People ex rel. Matheny v. Scully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Matheny v. Scully, 127 A.D.2d 719, 511 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43209 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Coppola, J.), dated June 7, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The papers submitted by the petitioner do not set forth a valid claim for habeas corpus relief (see, People ex rel. Gist v LeFevre, 88 AD2d 731, 732, appeal dismissed and appeal denied 57 NY2d 724). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Gist v. LeFevre
88 A.D.2d 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D.2d 719, 511 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-matheny-v-scully-nyappdiv-1987.