People ex rel. Mason v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Mason v. Miller

260 A.D. 940, 23 N.Y.S.2d 250, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5552

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 940 (People ex rel. Mason v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Mason v. Miller, 260 A.D. 940, 23 N.Y.S.2d 250, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

In certiorari proceeding to review an assessment of real property defendants appeal from a final order reducing the assessments from $132,000 to $80,000 for the tax year of 1938, and the first half of the tax year of 1939. Order modified by providing that the assessment for the year 1938 and the first half of the year 1939 be fixed in the sum of $80,000 for the land, and $20,000 for the improvements — a total assessed valuation of $100,000; and, as thus modified, the order is unanimously affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion that the reduction in the land assessment was too drastic. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, John-ton and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In certiorari proceeding to review an assessment of real property defendants appeal from a final order reducing the assessments from $132,000 to $80,000 for the tax year of 1938, and the first half of the tax year of 1939. Order modified by providing that the assessment for the year 1938 and the first half of the year 1939 be fixed in the sum of $80,000 for the land, and $20,000 for the improvements — a total assessed valuation of $100,000; and, as thus modified, the order is unanimously affirmed, without costs. We are of opinion that the reduction in the land assessment was too drastic. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, John-ton and Adel, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 940, 23 N.Y.S.2d 250, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-mason-v-miller-nyappdiv-1940.