People Ex Rel. Marshall v. . Moore
112 N.E. 1070, 217 N.Y. 632, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1386
Opinion
Order affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Sea-bury and Pound, JJ.; Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., concurs on the sole ground that while proof of the Massachusetts statutes was necessary, it was properly supplied before the Appellate Division and this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People Ex Rel. Marshall v. . Moore, 112 N.E. 1070, 217 N.Y. 632, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1386 (N.Y. 1916).
112 N.E. 1070 (People Ex Rel. Marshall v. . Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Sieloff v. Golz
258 N.W.2d 700 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1977)
People ex rel. Hall v. Casscles
51 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
People ex rel. Grant v. Doherty
42 Misc. 2d 239 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
People ex rel. Arnold v. Hoy
32 Misc. 2d 824 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
People ex rel. Waldman v. Ruthazer
2 Misc. 2d 297 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
People ex rel. Kassin v. Sheriff of New York County
149 Misc. 11 (New York Supreme Court, 1933)
People ex rel. Pizzino v. Moran
137 Misc. 905 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)
People Ex Rel. Hayes v. McLaughlin
160 N.E. 357 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
People Ex Rel. De Martini v. McLaughlin
153 N.E. 853 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)