People ex rel. Marsh v. Genesee C. P.

4 Wend. 202
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1830
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Wend. 202 (People ex rel. Marsh v. Genesee C. P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Marsh v. Genesee C. P., 4 Wend. 202 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The appeal ought not to have been quashed; the relator did all that he could do, to comply with the requirements of the statute ; he paid all that was demanded of him. It is no cause for quashing an appeal that a justice takes less costs than he is entitled to receive, when a party is willing, and offers to pay all that can be required of him, and in fact pays all that is demanded. This case is very different from those reported in 6 Cowen, 61, and 1 Wendell, 282. In the case in Cowen there was no payment of the costs, the justice being simply directed to charge the costs to the party; and in the other the party refused to pay part of the costs, on a claim of being himself entitled to a portion of them. Let an alternative mandamus issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Saratoga Common Pleas
1 Wend. 282 (New York Supreme Court, 1828)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Wend. 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-marsh-v-genesee-c-p-nysupct-1830.