People ex rel. Marinello v. Director

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Marinello v. Director

307 A.D.2d 330, 762 N.Y.S.2d 509, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8282

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 21, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 307 A.D.2d 330 (People ex rel. Marinello v. Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Marinello v. Director, 307 A.D.2d 330, 762 N.Y.S.2d 509, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.), entered October 16, 2002, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, Kristian G.’s placement in a secure juvenile facility for a reduced period of eight months reflected the time he spent in the St. Mary’s Home awaiting a disposition by the Family Court.

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Accordingly, the petition was properly dismissed. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wexner, J.), entered October 16, 2002, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, Kristian G.’s placement in a secure juvenile facility for a reduced period of eight months reflected the time he spent in the St. Mary’s Home awaiting a disposition by the Family Court.

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Accordingly, the petition was properly dismissed. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 A.D.2d 330, 762 N.Y.S.2d 509, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-marinello-v-director-nyappdiv-2003.