People ex rel. Marinelli v. Maginley-Liddie

2025 NY Slip Op 04660
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 13, 2025
Docket2025-08944
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 04660 (People ex rel. Marinelli v. Maginley-Liddie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Marinelli v. Maginley-Liddie, 2025 NY Slip Op 04660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People ex rel. Marinelli v Maginley-Liddie (2025 NY Slip Op 04660)

People ex rel. Marinelli v Maginley-Liddie
2025 NY Slip Op 04660
Decided on August 13, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on August 13, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
LARA J. GENOVESI
WILLIAM G. FORD
DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.

2025-08944 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Robert Marinelli, on behalf of Christopher Marshall, petitioner,

v

Lynelle Maginley-Liddie, etc., respondent.


Robert Marinelli, New York, NY, petitioner pro se.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Morgan J. Dennehy, and Roxana Moussavian of counsel), for respondent.



Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Christopher Marshall upon his own recognizance upon Kings County Indictment No. 72527/2025, and application for waiver of costs, fees, and expenses.

ORDERED that the application for waiver of costs, fees, and expenses is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Kings County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger , 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson , 48 NY2d 230).

BARROS, J.P., GENOVESI, FORD and GOLIA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger
255 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 04660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-marinelli-v-maginley-liddie-nyappdiv-2025.