People ex rel. Manhattan Ry. Co. v. Woodbury

127 N.Y.S. 1138

This text of 127 N.Y.S. 1138 (People ex rel. Manhattan Ry. Co. v. Woodbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Manhattan Ry. Co. v. Woodbury, 127 N.Y.S. 1138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and judgment affirmed. Order filed.

INGRAHAM, P. X, and LAUGHLIN, X, dissent, on the ground that 7 per cent, should be allowed as the basis upon which the value of the special franchise should be capitalized.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 N.Y.S. 1138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-manhattan-ry-co-v-woodbury-nyappdiv-1911.