People ex rel. Manhattan Railway Co. v. Woodbury
143 A.D. 905
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 143 A.D. 905 (People ex rel. Manhattan Railway Co. v. Woodbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People ex rel. Manhattan Railway Co. v. Woodbury, 143 A.D. 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and judgment affirmed. No opinion. Ingraham, P. J., and Laughlin, J., dissented on the ground that seven per cent should be allowed as the basis upon which the value of the special'franchise should be capitalized.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People ex rel. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
159 A.D. 136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
People ex rel. Third Avenue Railroad v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
157 A.D. 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
People Ex Rel. R.R. Co. v. . Tax Comrs.
96 N.E. 435 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
People ex rel. Hudson & Manhattan Railraod v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
203 N.Y. 119 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
143 A.D. 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-manhattan-railway-co-v-woodbury-nyappdiv-1911.