People ex rel. Manhattan Railway Co. v. Woodbury
143 A.D. 905
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1911·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and judgment affirmed. No opinion. Ingraham, P. J., and Laughlin, J., dissented on the ground that seven per cent should be allowed as the basis upon which the value of the special'franchise should be capitalized.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Manhattan Railway Co. v. Woodbury, 143 A.D. 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
143 A.D. 905 (People ex rel. Manhattan Railway Co. v. Woodbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
159 A.D. 136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
People ex rel. Third Avenue Railroad v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
157 A.D. 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
People Ex Rel. R.R. Co. v. . Tax Comrs.
96 N.E. 435 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
People ex rel. Hudson & Manhattan Railraod v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
203 N.Y. 119 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)