People ex rel. Maltz v. Board of Education
This text of 41 Mich. 547 (People ex rel. Maltz v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eelator has mistaken his remedy: the school district of Alpena is entitled to have the money paid to itself, and this is an indirect way of collecting his claim against a district with which he never contracted. He must get his redress through the instrumentality of the Alpena district, and that district is the only party having a claim against the new one.
Mandamus denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 Mich. 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-maltz-v-board-of-education-mich-1879.