People ex rel. Maltz v. Board of Education
41 Mich. 547
Opinion
Eelator has mistaken his remedy: the school district of Alpena is entitled to have the money paid to itself, and this is an indirect way of collecting his claim against a district with which he never contracted. He must get his redress through the instrumentality of the Alpena district, and that district is the only party having a claim against the new one.
Mandamus denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Maltz v. Board of Education, 41 Mich. 547 (Mich. 1879).
41 Mich. 547 (People ex rel. Maltz v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wayne County Savings Bank v. School District No. 5
116 N.W. 378 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
Board of Supervisors of Presque Isle County v. Thompson
61 F. 914 (Sixth Circuit, 1894)
Turnbull v. Board of Education
8 N.W. 65 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1881)