People ex rel. Mallon v. Roosevelt
This text of 44 N.Y.S. 655 (People ex rel. Mallon v. Roosevelt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We have presented on this review questions of fact only. The evidence is capable of such a presentation as to, at least, raise a doubt whether the commissioners rightly decided» those questions. In such a situation, we are to remember that the commissioners, or at least one of them, had the advantage of observing the conduct of the witnesses while giving their testimony, and to bear in mind the rule that the findings of fact made upon a trial will not be interfered with unless so clearly against the weight of evidence as would compel us to set aside a verdict of a jury. Thus proceeding, we are not called" upon to interfere with the action of the commissioners in dismissing" the relator from the force-
The writ should be dismissed, with costs.
VAN BRUNT, P. J., and WILLIAMS, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 N.Y.S. 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-mallon-v-roosevelt-nyappdiv-1897.