People ex rel. Mallard v. Judges of Madison County

7 Cow. 423
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1827·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Curia.

The case is not essentially varied from what it was upon the affidavits originally presented. It was the business of the appellee to search, and find out whether the proceedings were regular or not, in the first instance; and before the cause was noticed a third time for trial. This consideration alone is sufficient to deny him costs, beyond those of the motion to quash.

But we go on another ground in this class of cases. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction in the cause. Mot having jurisdiction of that, the general costs cannot be ^awarded. They are incident to the cause. Jurisdiction failing as to the principal, it must also fail as to the incident. All that remains, is a jurisdiction of the parties and motion, as to which motion alone, costs can be given.

Peremptory mandamus granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Mallard v. Judges of Madison County, 7 Cow. 423 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

7 Cow. 423 (People ex rel. Mallard v. Judges of Madison County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Magill v. North Dakota Millers' Ass'n
51 N.Y.S. 1145 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Bernhard v. Rice
15 N.Y.S. 936 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Bartels v. Hoey
3 Colo. 279 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1877)
Harriott v. New Jersey Railroad
8 Abb. Pr. 284 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1858)
Burnham v. Rangeley
4 F. Cas. 775 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine, 1847)
Lowe v. The Benjamin
15 F. Cas. 1016 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1847)