People ex rel. Mabery v. Leonardo
This text of 179 A.D.2d 848 (People ex rel. Mabery v. Leonardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Supreme Court properly determined that petitioner was not entitled to habeas corpus relief in this case. As the court noted, it had already denied a previous petition for such relief and, insofar as no new grounds were presented in petitioner’s present application, the denial should be sustained (see, CPLR 7003 [b]; People ex rel. Sanchez v Hoke, 132 AD2d 861). Furthermore, as the court also pointed out, petitioner’s assertions concerning the legality of his sentence could have been [849]*849advanced by way of a CPL article 440 motion and therefore habeas corpus is not the proper remedy (see, People ex rel. Rosado v Miles, 138 AD2d 808).
Levine, Mercure, Crew III, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 A.D.2d 848, 578 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-mabery-v-leonardo-nyappdiv-1992.