People ex rel. Lupo v. Fay

197 N.E.2d 543, 13 N.Y.2d 1178
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 23, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 197 N.E.2d 543 (People ex rel. Lupo v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Lupo v. Fay, 197 N.E.2d 543, 13 N.Y.2d 1178 (N.Y. 1964).

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that his absence from the courtroom during the argument of a motion respecting whether the jury should continue its deliberation or be discharged violated his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held that appellant’s constitutional rights had not been violated. [See 13 N Y 2d 253.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Williams
186 A.D.2d 161 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Turaine
78 N.Y.2d 871 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
People v. Ferguson
115 A.D.2d 215 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 N.E.2d 543, 13 N.Y.2d 1178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-lupo-v-fay-ny-1964.