People ex rel. Lupo v. Fay

197 N.E.2d 543, 13 N.Y.2d 1178
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 23, 1964·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that his absence from the courtroom during the argument of a motion respecting whether the jury should continue its deliberation or be discharged violated his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held that appellant’s constitutional rights had not been violated. [See 13 N Y 2d 253.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Lupo v. Fay, 197 N.E.2d 543, 13 N.Y.2d 1178 (N.Y. 1964).

197 N.E.2d 543 (People ex rel. Lupo v. Fay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Williams
186 A.D.2d 161 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Turaine
78 N.Y.2d 871 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
People v. Ferguson
115 A.D.2d 215 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)