People ex rel. Lublin v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Lublin v. New York State Division of Parole

128 A.D.2d 746, 513 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44429

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1987·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dachenhausen, J.), entered November 4, 1985, which dismissed the proceeding; and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, entered March 4, 1986, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as it was superseded by the order made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner has been released from custody, and is, therefore, not entitled to the extraordinary relief of habeas corpus (see, People ex rel. Julio v Walters, 58 NY2d 881; People ex rel. Wilder v Markley, 26 NY2d 648; People ex rel. Kitchen [747] v Sullivan, 121 AD2d 415). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dachenhausen, J.), entered November 4, 1985, which dismissed the proceeding; and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, entered March 4, 1986, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as it was superseded by the order made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner has been released from custody, and is, therefore, not entitled to the extraordinary relief of habeas corpus (see, People ex rel. Julio v Walters, 58 NY2d 881; People ex rel. Wilder v Markley, 26 NY2d 648; People ex rel. Kitchen [747] v Sullivan, 121 AD2d 415). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.

People ex rel. Lublin v. New York State Division of Parole, 128 A.D.2d 746, 513 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44429 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

128 A.D.2d 746 (People ex rel. Lublin v. New York State Division of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related