People ex rel. London v. Baschnagel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. London v. Baschnagel

100 A.D.2d 690, 473 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17672

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 100 A.D.2d 690 (People ex rel. London v. Baschnagel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. London v. Baschnagel, 100 A.D.2d 690, 473 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for extension of time to perfect appeal and for other relief. Petitioner was indicted for the crimes of murder in the second degree and conspiracy in the second degree. Following arraignment, he was remanded to the county jail without bail. Thereafter he commenced the instant proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus seeking his immediate release or the fixing of reasonable bail. The writ was dismissed and petitioner appealed. Thereafter petitioner was convicted of murder in the second degree. He is presently confined in a State correctional facility and an appeal from the judgment of conviction is pending. The issue presented by the appeal in this proceeding has been rendered academic by petitioner’s conviction (see People ex rel. Sostre v Tutuska, 31 AD2d 737, mot for lv to app den 23 NY2d 646). On the court’s own motion, appeal dismissed as academic. H Motion for extension of time and for other relief dismissed as academic. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for extension of time to perfect appeal and for other relief. Petitioner was indicted for the crimes of murder in the second degree and conspiracy in the second degree. Following arraignment, he was remanded to the county jail without bail. Thereafter he commenced the instant proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus seeking his immediate release or the fixing of reasonable bail. The writ was dismissed and petitioner appealed. Thereafter petitioner was convicted of murder in the second degree. He is presently confined in a State correctional facility and an appeal from the judgment of conviction is pending. The issue presented by the appeal in this proceeding has been rendered academic by petitioner’s conviction (see People ex rel. Sostre v Tutuska, 31 AD2d 737, mot for lv to app den 23 NY2d 646). On the court’s own motion, appeal dismissed as academic. H Motion for extension of time and for other relief dismissed as academic. Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.2d 690, 473 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-london-v-baschnagel-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack