People ex rel. Lombardi v. Casscles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Lombardi v. Casscles

37 A.D.2d 614, 323 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3816

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 614 (People ex rel. Lombardi v. Casscles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Lombardi v. Casscles, 37 A.D.2d 614, 323 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered October 7, 1970, which, after a hearing, dismissed the writ and remanded him to the custody of respondent. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remanded to the Special Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. We find no merit to relator’s contentions with regard to the. computation of “ good time ” credit. On appeal he raised the question of invalidity of the parole revocation procedures whereby he was allegedly deprived of the right to counsel and was allegedly not afforded a hearing. As to these issues further proceedings are required in accordance with the rules and procedures set forth in People ex rel. Maggio v. Casscles (28 N Y 2d 415). Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered October 7, 1970, which, after a hearing, dismissed the writ and remanded him to the custody of respondent. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remanded to the Special Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. We find no merit to relator’s contentions with regard to the. computation of “ good time ” credit. On appeal he raised the question of invalidity of the parole revocation procedures whereby he was allegedly deprived of the right to counsel and was allegedly not afforded a hearing. As to these issues further proceedings are required in accordance with the rules and procedures set forth in People ex rel. Maggio v. Casscles (28 N Y 2d 415). Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 614, 323 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-lombardi-v-casscles-nyappdiv-1971.