People ex rel. Livermore v. Burnap

38 Mich. 350, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 79
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 1, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 Mich. 350 (People ex rel. Livermore v. Burnap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Livermore v. Burnap, 38 Mich. 350, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 79 (Mich. 1878).

Opinion

Marston, J.

The defendant in his return to the writ of certiorari in this case, after setting forth that an application was made to him for the opening of a certain ditch, a bond given, etc., says: “I immediately appointed the 15th day of May, 1877, at two o’clock in the afternoon, at the house of O. Peters, in the said township of Pittsford, as a time and place of examination on such application, and gave the notice required by statute to the parties interested in such ditch;” that he caused a survey to be made, etc. How or in what manner this notice was given, or when it was served upon the parties interested, in no way appears, except as above stated. This is wholly insufficient; the facts should be clearly set forth, so that the court would be able to ascertain and determine therefrom whether the notice which the statute requires had been given or not. This inquiry the commissioner cannot conclude by his answer.

The proceedings must be set aside and held for naught.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Township of Whiteford v. Phinney
18 N.W. 593 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)
Lane v. Burnap
39 Mich. 736 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Mich. 350, 1878 Mich. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-livermore-v-burnap-mich-1878.