People ex rel. Little v. Commissioner of the Department of Correction

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Little v. Commissioner of the Department of Correction

214 A.D.2d 627, 624 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4072

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 214 A.D.2d 627 (People ex rel. Little v. Commissioner of the Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Little v. Commissioner of the Department of Correction, 214 A.D.2d 627, 624 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4072 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to terminate a securing order issued by the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Kings County Indictment No. 4464/90, pursuant to a direction in a decision and order of this Court dated February 14, 1995. On March 31, 1995, the Supreme Court, Kings County, extended the securing order for 30 days.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and after hearing oral argument in support of the application and in opposition thereto, it is

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the Supreme Court, Kings County, properly extended the securing order. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to terminate a securing order issued by the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Kings County Indictment No. 4464/90, pursuant to a direction in a decision and order of this Court dated February 14, 1995. On March 31, 1995, the Supreme Court, Kings County, extended the securing order for 30 days.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and after hearing oral argument in support of the application and in opposition thereto, it is

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the Supreme Court, Kings County, properly extended the securing order. Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 627, 624 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-little-v-commissioner-of-the-department-of-correction-nyappdiv-1995.