People ex rel. Liotti v. Eatmond

246 A.D.2d 613, 667 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 439

This text of 246 A.D.2d 613 (People ex rel. Liotti v. Eatmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Liotti v. Eatmond, 246 A.D.2d 613, 667 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 439 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Queens [614]*614County Indictment Nos. 3251-97 and 3825-97 and Nassau County Indictment No. 3717N-97.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determinations of the Supreme Court, Queens County, and the County Court, Nassau County, were not improvident exercises of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger, 25 NY2d 497, 499; see, People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson, 48 NY2d 230). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger
255 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D.2d 613, 667 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-liotti-v-eatmond-nyappdiv-1998.