People ex rel. Link v. Tucker

96 Colo. 273
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided December 17, 1934·No. No. 13,121·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Holland did not participate in the hearing or in the consideration of this cause. Chief Justice Adams and Justices Butler and Burke are of the opinion that it should be affirmed, whereas Justices Campbell, Hilliard and Bouck are of the opinion that it should be reversed. As it therefore must be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court, no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Link v. Tucker, 96 Colo. 273 (Colo. 1934).

96 Colo. 273 (People ex rel. Link v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duc Van Le v. Ibarra
843 P.2d 15 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1992)