People Ex Rel. Lewis v. . Sherman
64 N.E. 1124, 171 N.Y. 684, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 998
Opinion
*685 Order affirmed on the ground that the relator was not in office, but without costs, as that was not true when the pioceeding was instituted ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People Ex Rel. Lewis v. . Sherman, 64 N.E. 1124, 171 N.Y. 684, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 998 (N.Y. 1902).
64 N.E. 1124 (People Ex Rel. Lewis v. . Sherman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Komyathy v. Board of Education of Wappinger Central School District No. 1
75 Misc. 2d 859 (New York Supreme Court, 1973)
Cary v. Council of the City of Binghamton
178 Misc. 265 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)
Bryan v. Town Board of the Town of Brighton
133 Misc. 315 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)
People ex rel. Woodbury v. Hendrick
168 A.D. 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
People ex rel. Sebring v. Common Council
160 A.D. 914 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
State ex rel. Schloss v. Stevens
34 Nev. 146 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1911)