People ex rel. Lewis v. McMann

267 N.E.2d 586, 28 N.Y.2d 496, 318 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1637
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 6, 1971
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 267 N.E.2d 586 (People ex rel. Lewis v. McMann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Lewis v. McMann, 267 N.E.2d 586, 28 N.Y.2d 496, 318 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1637 (N.Y. 1971).

Opinion

Memorandum. We agree with the courts below that the relator has not been deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial since the delay of seven and one-half months between the indictment and trial was largely caused by relator’s multiple motions and delaying tactics. The record discloses that between the time of his indictment and trial, he appeared in court no less than 19 times on various motions and applications. Furthermore, trial was delayed by reason of the discharge hy the relator of two assigned counsel, as well as counsel retained by his family.

Under the circumstances, the petition for habeas corpus was properly denied since the relator by his own conduct and actions caused the delay of his trial. (Matter of Blake v. Hogan, 25 N Y 2d 747.)

[498]*498Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scilbppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen concur; Judge Cibson taking no part.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Planthaber
131 A.D.2d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Rodriguez
407 N.E.2d 475 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 N.E.2d 586, 28 N.Y.2d 496, 318 N.Y.S.2d 942, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-lewis-v-mcmann-ny-1971.