People ex rel. Leneau v. Warden of Otis Bantum Corr. Facility

2018 NY Slip Op 1195
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 21, 2018
Docket2017-10768
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 1195 (People ex rel. Leneau v. Warden of Otis Bantum Corr. Facility) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Leneau v. Warden of Otis Bantum Corr. Facility, 2018 NY Slip Op 1195 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People ex rel. Leneau v Warden of Otis Bantum Corr. Facility (2018 NY Slip Op 01195)
People ex rel. Leneau v Warden of Otis Bantum Corr. Facility
2018 NY Slip Op 01195
Decided on February 21, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 21, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SHERI S. ROMAN
SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.

2017-10768 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Ernest Leneau, petitioner,

v

Warden of Otis Bantum Correction Facility, respondent.


Ernest Leneau, East Elmhurst, NY, petitioner pro se.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Matthew J. Bennett of counsel), for respondent.



Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for the release of the petitioner pursuant to CPL 30.30(2)(a) upon Kings County Indictment No. 112/16, and application by the petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

ORDERED that the application for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The instant petition is a successive application for habeas corpus relief, which is neither warranted nor supported by any changed circumstances. Accordingly, the writ of habeas corpus must be dismissed (see CPLR 7003[b]; Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v Lavery, 152 AD3d 73, 75-76).

BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. Ex Rel. Tommy v. Lavery
2017 NY Slip Op 4574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 1195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-leneau-v-warden-of-otis-bantum-corr-facility-nyappdiv-2018.