People ex rel. Lehigh Valley Railway Co. v. Vandemark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Lehigh Valley Railway Co. v. Vandemark

262 A.D. 946, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6560, 29 N.Y.S.2d 957

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 946 (People ex rel. Lehigh Valley Railway Co. v. Vandemark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Lehigh Valley Railway Co. v. Vandemark, 262 A.D. 946, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6560, 29 N.Y.S.2d 957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified on the law and facts, without costs, by inserting in the sixth line of the ordering portion thereof after the word “ respondents ” and before the words “ set forth ” the following: “ In so far as they have knowledge of the facts or means of acquiring the same through possession or control of records and documents or otherwise.” All concur. (The order directs defendants to make a further return to an amended writ of certiorari in a proceeding to review an assessment upon relator’s property so as to comply with section 292 of the Tax Law.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified on the law and facts, without costs, by inserting in the sixth line of the ordering portion thereof after the word “ respondents ” and before the words “ set forth ” the following: “ In so far as they have knowledge of the facts or means of acquiring the same through possession or control of records and documents or otherwise.” All concur. (The order directs defendants to make a further return to an amended writ of certiorari in a proceeding to review an assessment upon relator’s property so as to comply with section 292 of the Tax Law.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 946, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6560, 29 N.Y.S.2d 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-lehigh-valley-railway-co-v-vandemark-nyappdiv-1941.