People ex rel. Leeds v. Ashworth
267 A.D. 684, 48 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4806
Opinion
The court had jurisdiction to try the crime charged and it had jurisdiction of the person of defendant. (People ex rel. Railey v. McCann, 222 App. Div. 465.) The question as to the sufficiency of the information and other points may properly he raised upon an appeal from the judgment. (People v. Zambounis, 251 N. Y. 94.)
The order appealed from should he affirmed.
Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ., concur.
Order unanimously affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People ex rel. Leeds v. Ashworth, 267 A.D. 684, 48 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).
267 A.D. 684 (People ex rel. Leeds v. Ashworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Zambounis
167 N.E. 183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
People ex rel. Bailey v. McCann
222 A.D. 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)