People ex rel. Leeds v. Ashworth

267 A.D. 684, 48 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4806

This text of 267 A.D. 684 (People ex rel. Leeds v. Ashworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Leeds v. Ashworth, 267 A.D. 684, 48 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court had jurisdiction to try the crime charged and it had jurisdiction of the person of defendant. (People ex rel. Railey v. McCann, 222 App. Div. 465.) The question as to the sufficiency of the information and other points may properly he raised upon an appeal from the judgment. (People v. Zambounis, 251 N. Y. 94.)

The order appealed from should he affirmed.

Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Zambounis
167 N.E. 183 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
People ex rel. Bailey v. McCann
222 A.D. 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 A.D. 684, 48 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-leeds-v-ashworth-nyappdiv-1944.