People ex rel. Lee v. Lee

112 A.D.3d 762, 976 N.Y.S.2d 394

This text of 112 A.D.3d 762 (People ex rel. Lee v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Lee v. Lee, 112 A.D.3d 762, 976 N.Y.S.2d 394 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70 for a writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Sammarco, J.), dated October 7, 2011, which, without a hearing, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The issue that the petitioner raises in this proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus was raised by the petitioner, and reviewed by the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), in a prior motion to vacate his judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL article 440. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding as procedurally barred (see People ex rel. Burgess v Ercole, 70 AD3d 735 [2010]; People ex rel. Abdul-Aziz v Marshall, 68 AD3d 902 [2009]; People ex rel. [763]*763Almeyda v Schultz, 18 AD3d 582 [2005]). Mastro, J.P., Lott, Austin and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Almeyda v. Schultz
18 A.D.3d 582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People ex rel. Abdul-Aziz v. Marshall
68 A.D.3d 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People ex rel. Burgess v. Ercole
70 A.D.3d 735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A.D.3d 762, 976 N.Y.S.2d 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-lee-v-lee-nyappdiv-2013.