People ex rel. Lee v. Commissioner of the N.Y. City Dept. of Corr.

2026 NY Slip Op 00607
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 9, 2026
Docket2026-01137
StatusPublished

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 00607 (People ex rel. Lee v. Commissioner of the N.Y. City Dept. of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Lee v. Commissioner of the N.Y. City Dept. of Corr., 2026 NY Slip Op 00607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People ex rel. Lee v Commissioner of the N.Y. City Dept. of Corr. (2026 NY Slip Op 00607)
People ex rel. Lee v Commissioner of the N.Y. City Dept. of Corr.
2026 NY Slip Op 00607
Decided on February 9, 2026
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 9, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
LARA J. GENOVESI, J.P.
BARRY E. WARHIT
LAURENCE L. LOVE
SUSAN QUIRK, JJ.

2026-01137

[*1]The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Howard D. Lee, on behalf of Lianu Luis Delgado, petitioner,

v

Commissioner of the New York City Department of Corrections, et al., respondents.


Howard D. Lee, Brooklyn, NY, petitioner pro se.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Holly C. Jordan, Nancy Fitzpatrick Talcott, and Johnnette Traill of counsel), respondent pro se and for respondent Commissioner of the New York City Department of Corrections.



DECISION & JUDGMENT

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release Lianu Luis Delgado upon his own recognizance or, in the alternative, to set reasonable bail upon Queens County Indictment No. 74407/2025.

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Queens County, did not violate "constitutional or statutory standards" (People ex rel. Klein v Krueger , 25 NY2d 497, 499; see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson , 48 NY2d 230).

GENOVESI, J.P., WARHIT, LOVE and QUIRK, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger
255 N.E.2d 552 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson
397 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 00607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-lee-v-commissioner-of-the-ny-city-dept-of-corr-nyappdiv-2026.