People ex rel. Lavallee v. New York State Attorney General's Office

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People ex rel. Lavallee v. New York State Attorney General's Office

109 A.D.3d 564, 970 N.Y.S.2d 702

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 15, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D.3d 564 (People ex rel. Lavallee v. New York State Attorney General's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People ex rel. Lavallee v. New York State Attorney General's Office, 109 A.D.3d 564, 970 N.Y.S.2d 702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

— Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application on behalf of Anand Persaud to modify an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 2, 2013, which granted bail on certain conditions upon Nassau County docket No. 2013NA017262.

Adjudged that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the condition imposed by the order dated August 2, 2013, limiting the travel of Anand Persaud to his attorney’s office and the homes of family members in Queens County, is eliminated and replaced by a condition allowing Anand Persaud to travel to any location (a) where the electronic monitoring device worn by Anand Persaud is functional, as determined by the Nassau County Department of Probation, and (b) that is within a 100-mile radius of Anand Persaud’s residence, and the application is otherwise denied. Skelos, J.P, Dickerson, Leventhal and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application on behalf of Anand Persaud to modify an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 2, 2013, which granted bail on certain conditions upon Nassau County docket No. 2013NA017262.

Adjudged that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the condition imposed by the order dated August 2, 2013, limiting the travel of Anand Persaud to his attorney’s office and the homes of family members in Queens County, is eliminated and replaced by a condition allowing Anand Persaud to travel to any location (a) where the electronic monitoring device worn by Anand Persaud is functional, as determined by the Nassau County Department of Probation, and (b) that is within a 100-mile radius of Anand Persaud’s residence, and the application is otherwise denied. Skelos, J.P, Dickerson, Leventhal and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.3d 564, 970 N.Y.S.2d 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-lavallee-v-new-york-state-attorney-generals-office-nyappdiv-2013.