People ex rel. Lake v. Hegeman

4 N.Y.S. 351, 22 N.Y. St. Rep. 663, 51 Hun 644, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 321
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 11, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 4 N.Y.S. 351 (People ex rel. Lake v. Hegeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Lake v. Hegeman, 4 N.Y.S. 351, 22 N.Y. St. Rep. 663, 51 Hun 644, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 321 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Opinion

Barnard, P. J.

In 1847 the legislature enacted that certain unpaid taxes in school-districts should be paid by the county treasurer. Chapter 480, Laws 1847, §§ 89, 90. This law was amended by chapter 555, Laws 1864, tit. 7, §§ 75-78. The first act embraced only taxes for lands unoccupied by owner or his agent, and without tenants. The law of 1864, § 75, extended the [352]*352list of unpaid taxes so as to embrace all non-resident lands. The law of 1883» c. 250, again extended the list so as to include all unpaid taxes on all real estate placed upon the tax-list and delivered to the collector. The collector of taxes in school-district Mo. 2 of Mewtown, of Queens county, failed to collect certain taxes, and make a return thereof to the trustees, as is required by the several laws above specified. The law requires a diligent effort upon the part of collectors to collect the tax, and it also requires an oath from him that he has done so. The county treasurer, on being presented with this return of the collector from the trustee, is bound by the law to pay the unpaid taxes, and to return the list to the board of supervisors, who are bound to assess them upon the several pieces of land on which the school taxes are unpaid, and to reimburse the county in that way, with 7 per cent, additional by way of interest. It plainly appears that the collector of the school-district has nob done his duty. He made no real effort to collect the tax, but the county treasurer cannot set that up as a defense to the payment of the unpaid taxes, as required by the law, upon receiving the official returns. There is no proof showing that the tax was in any respect illegal. A tax for a new site for a school-house is legal, even if the designated site could not be conveyed with a good title, as subsequently found on examination. The county treasurer could not refuse on that account to pay the tax. People v. Halsey, 37 N. Y. 344. The collector for the school-district gave the notice required by law for all persons voluntarily to pay the tax, and the only way now open to the compulsory payment is for the supervisors to assess the tax back on the delinquents, and that cannot be done until the county treasurer follows out the plain requirements of the law. Judgment is therefore affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The People v. . Halsey
37 N.Y. 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 N.Y.S. 351, 22 N.Y. St. Rep. 663, 51 Hun 644, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-lake-v-hegeman-nysupct-1889.