People ex rel. Lahm v. Sheriff
This text of 233 A.D. 744 (People ex rel. Lahm v. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order dismissing writ of habeas corpus reversed upon the law and the facts, without costs, writ sustained, and relator discharged, upon the ground that the undisputed evidence shows that the relator was not in the demanding State at any period of time between the date specified in the indictment as the date of the commission of the offense and the time of the finding of the indictment. (People ex rel. Gottschalk v. Brown, 237 N. Y. 483, 488.) Moreover, there was no dispute that up to the period when relator left the demanding State he had complied with his parental obligation. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 A.D. 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-lahm-v-sheriff-nyappdiv-1931.