People Ex Rel. L.A.E.L. P. Co. v. . P.S. Com.

New York Court of Appeals

People Ex Rel. L.A.E.L. P. Co. v. . P.S. Com.

92 N.E. 629, 199 N.Y. 254, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 1237

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 29, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 N.E. 629 (People Ex Rel. L.A.E.L. P. Co. v. . P.S. Com.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People Ex Rel. L.A.E.L. P. Co. v. . P.S. Com., 92 N.E. 629, 199 N.Y. 254, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 1237 (N.Y. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

The appeal in this proceeding must be dismissed on the ground that the court is without jurisdiction to entertain it. The relator applied to the public service commission in the first district for leave to issue stocks and bonds for corporate purposes. The application was denied. Thereupon the relator obtained a writ of certiorari, which was sustained by the Appellate Division by an order directing that the determination of the commission "be and it hereby is annulled with $50 costs and relator's disbursements to be taxed, and the relator's application for authority to issue stock and bonds and to execute a mortgage to secure such bonds be and it hereby is referred back to the Public Service Commission for the First District for consideration and action within the limits of its authority."

This order, by which the proceeding is referred back to the public service commission for further action, is not final within the purview of the Constitution and section 190 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as interpreted in Van Arsdale v. King (155 N.Y. 325) and later cases. The proceeding cannot be said to be finally terminated until the public service commission has again acted pursuant to the order of the Appellate Division. In this respect the proceeding at bar is radically different from one in which an assessment is reviewed with the result that the assessment as made is annulled and a new one is ordered. (Peopleex rel. Jamaica Water Supply Co. v. State Board of Tax Comrs.,196 N.Y. 39.) In the latter case the proceeding leading up to the second assessment is to all intents and purposes a new and independent proceeding (Matter of Douglas v. Bd. ofSupervisors, 172 N.Y. 309), and for that reason an appeal will lie from the decision annulling the first assessment.

CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, with costs. *Page 256

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appeal in this proceeding must be dismissed on the ground that the court is without jurisdiction to entertain it. The relator applied to the public service commission in the first district for leave to issue stocks and bonds for corporate purposes. The application was denied. Thereupon the relator obtained a writ of certiorari, which was sustained by the Appellate Division by an order directing that the determination of the commission "be and it hereby is annulled with $50 costs and relator's disbursements to be taxed, and the relator's application for authority to issue stock and bonds and to execute a mortgage to secure such bonds be and it hereby is referred back to the Public Service Commission for the First District for consideration and action within the limits of its authority."

This order, by which the proceeding is referred back to the public service commission for further action, is not final within the purview of the Constitution and section 190 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as interpreted in Van Arsdale v. King (155 N.Y. 325) and later cases. The proceeding cannot be said to be finally terminated until the public service commission has again acted pursuant to the order of the Appellate Division. In this respect the proceeding at bar is radically different from one in which an assessment is reviewed with the result that the assessment as made is annulled and a new one is ordered. (Peopleex rel. Jamaica Water Supply Co. v. State Board of Tax Comrs.,196 N.Y. 39.) In the latter case the proceeding leading up to the second assessment is to all intents and purposes a new and independent proceeding (Matter of Douglas v. Bd. ofSupervisors, 172 N.Y. 309), and for that reason an appeal will lie from the decision annulling the first assessment.

CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, with costs. *Page 256

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 N.E. 629, 199 N.Y. 254, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 1237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-lael-p-co-v-ps-com-ny-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack