People ex rel Labicki v. Brophy

256 A.D. 1047, 10 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6010

This text of 256 A.D. 1047 (People ex rel Labicki v. Brophy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel Labicki v. Brophy, 256 A.D. 1047, 10 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: As the law existed at the time the appellant committed the crime of attempting to escape from prison, after a previous felony, the seven-year sentence was a proper one. (Penal Law, §§ 1695, 1935, and 1941.) Attempt to escape is named a felony under the Penal Law and not an “ attempt to commit a crime ” within the meaning of section 261 of the Penal Law. We find no error in respect to the other points raised by relator. (People ex rel. Labicki v. Brophy, 250 App. Div. 831; People ex rel. Kammerer v. Brophy, 255 id. 821.) All concur. (The order dismisses a writ of habeas corpus and remands relator into custody.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Labicki v. Brophy
250 A.D. 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D. 1047, 10 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-labicki-v-brophy-nyappdiv-1939.