People ex rel Labicki v. Brophy

256 A.D. 1047, 10 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6010
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People ex rel Labicki v. Brophy. Read the opinion of the Court — 250 A.D. 831

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: As the law existed at the time the appellant committed the crime of attempting to escape from prison, after a previous felony, the seven-year sentence was a proper one. (Penal Law, §§ 1695, 1935, and 1941.) Attempt to escape is named a felony under the Penal Law and not an “ attempt to commit a crime ” within the meaning of section 261 of the Penal Law. We find no error in respect to the other points raised by relator. (People ex rel. Labicki v. Brophy, 250 App. Div. 831; People ex rel. Kammerer v. Brophy, 255 id. 821.) All concur. (The order dismisses a writ of habeas corpus and remands relator into custody.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel Labicki v. Brophy, 256 A.D. 1047, 10 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

256 A.D. 1047 (People ex rel Labicki v. Brophy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Labicki v. Brophy
250 A.D. 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)